Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nonymous's avatar

I think you articulate something really important here, something that needs to be taken into consideration when trying to figure out how to bridge the gap between virulent mistrust of science and the very real and tangible benefits science has provided the human race.

I have multiple chronic illnesses and have been on a medical odyssey for the last twenty years. I have had both good and bad experiences with doctors, and for sure having a bad experience with a medical professional when you're already in a highly vulnerable state does serious and sometimes irreversible damage. I have had to do a lot of doctor shopping to find professionals I feel comfortable with because I have had to fight at times to get doctors to take me seriously and provide me with the care I need. And as frustrating as that has been for me, I am 100% aware of how privileged I am to live in an area that offers me multiple options and to have enough insurance coverage and financial security to enable me to do that doctor shopping.

If I didn't have that insurance coverage and financial security, I might very well not be here to type this because the specialists I need to see, the procedures I need to have regularly, and the medications I need to take to manage my conditions are all hideously expensive. Without access to modern medicine, I would for sure be dead right now. I think this tension is the problem with healthcare in general. I am both grateful for it and sometimes deeply mistrustful of it. It is so expensive, so hard to obtain, and so dehumanizing that I also fully understand why some people reject it altogether.

The problem is that the MAHA movements isn't proposing any real changes and some of what they're proposing will do active harm. Supplements and dietary changes are not going to fix my issues the way a lot of MAHA proponents claim. However, I fully understand the deep-seated need people feel to find healthcare that feels empowering and responsive to individual needs. We would all benefit if we could figure out how to harness that energy to create a system that serves the needs of human beings instead of venture capitalists and pharmaceutical corporations.

Expand full comment
I’ve Really Seen Enough's avatar

Yes, science has failings, but the foundation of scientific thinking is to retest facts and assumptions. Therein lies the profound and overarching difference between MAHA and “believe science .” The “believe science” camp, in which I stand proudly, is and always has been (in this country) open to the possibility that science gets things wrong. MAHA, founded on assertions without evidence, requires perpetual, unquestioning and blind obedience to the cult leader of the moment. And here we are gutting the CDC and NIH including world-leading researchers in Alzheimer’s and cancer treatment, not to mention vaccines. The price will be rivers of blood and lost years of life.

Expand full comment
72 more comments...

No posts